Ask it like a fan: a team, a player, “Cats v Pies”, “NRL ladder”, or a stats question like “who's made the most ducks”. Every stat we hold is in the Stats Centre.
Meghann Shaughnessy v Kim Clijsters: stats compared | Lineball
Clijsters wins on first serve in %. Shaughnessy’s case rests on first-serve points won %, but it isn’t enough to swing it. WTA Tour 2004: Shaughnessy 42 matches, Clijsters 22 matches.
Clijsters has the better first serve in %: 61.6 to Shaughnessy’s 51.1.
Shaughnessy averages 0.9 aces a match to Clijsters’ 0.3 — 2.9 times as many.
Clijsters has the better sets won %: 87.2 to Shaughnessy’s 49.5.
Shaughnessy ranks 3rd of 86 in WTA Tour 2004 for first-serve points won %.
Winners’ edge: Clijsters’s team won 91%, Shaughnessy’s team won 48% of the matches they played.
Longevity: Shaughnessy has 42 matches, Clijsters 22 — the averages matter more than the totals here.
Built only from games in our stats database. A read of the numbers, not a tip.
Tale of the tape
Per game, with league rank among regular players.
–Titlesper game0.12 total · best 1
51.1#81 of 86First serve in %61.6
72.1★ #3 of 86First-serve points won %68.1
61.4#11 of 86Break points saved %57.9
39.3#80 of 86Return points won %51.8
0.939 total · best 11#10 of 84Acesper game0.37 total · best 3
Head to head
27 matches since 20005
Hard · 6 matchesShaughnessy 2Clijsters 4
Grass · 1 matchShaughnessy 0Clijsters 1
Grand Slams · 2 matchesShaughnessy 0Clijsters 2
Last meetings
19 Oct 2009 · Luxembourg · Round of 32 · HardClijsters won 6-2 6-2
25 Aug 2003 · US Open · Round of 16 · HardClijsters won 6-2 6-4
24 Feb 2003 · Scottsdale · Semifinal · HardClijsters won 6-3 7-5
23 July 2001 · Stanford · Semifinal · HardClijsters won 6-3 2-6 6-1
25 June 2001 · Wimbledon · Round of 16 · GrassClijsters won 7-6(2) 7-6(5)
26 Feb 2001 · Scottsdale · Quarterfinal · HardShaughnessy won 6-2 6-4
24 July 2000 · Stanford · Round of 32 · HardShaughnessy won 3-6 7-6(4) 6-3
Last 10 games
Titles, oldest to newest in 2004.
Shaughnessy––––––––––
Clijsters––1––––––
11.2471 total · best 20#29 of 89Games wonper game12.4272 total · best 16
38.9#69 of 86Break points converted %57.6
49.5#46 of 89Sets won %87.2
50.7#40 of 89Games won %66.5
–Finalsper game0.13 total · best 1
1.147 total · best 2#50 of 89Sets wonper game1.941 total · best 2
1.148 total · best 2#44 of 89Sets lostper game · lower is better0.36 total · best 2
10.9458 total · best 18#51 of 89Games lostper game · lower is better6.2137 total · best 16
0.313 total · best 2#10 of 89Tiebreaksper game0.24 total · best 1
1.040 total · best 8#69 of 86Double faultsper game · lower is better1.533 total · best 9