Ask it like a fan: a team, a player, “Cats v Pies”, “NRL ladder”, or a stats question like “who's made the most ducks”. Every stat we hold is in the Stats Centre.
Anna Lena Groenefeld v Virginie Razzano: stats compared | Lineball
Lena Groenefeld wins on first-serve points won %. Razzano’s case rests on first serve in %, but it isn’t enough to swing it. WTA Tour 2006: Lena Groenefeld 58 matches, Razzano 28 matches.
Lena Groenefeld averages 2.2 aces a match to Razzano’s 0.7 — 3.3 times as many.
Razzano has the better first serve in %: 67.3 to Lena Groenefeld’s 58.6.
Lena Groenefeld has the better first-serve points won %: 65.6 to Razzano’s 58.7.
Winners’ edge: Lena Groenefeld’s team won 53%, Razzano’s team won 36% of the matches they played.
Longevity: Lena Groenefeld has 58 matches, Razzano 28 — the averages matter more than the totals here.
Built only from games in our stats database. A read of the numbers, not a tip.
Tale of the tape
Per game, with league rank among regular players.
0.01 total · best 1#28 of 28Titlesper game–
58.6#72 of 85First serve in %67.3#18 of 85
65.6#14 of 85First-serve points won %58.7#63 of 85
60.3#10 of 85Break points saved %57.2#25 of 85
42.7#58 of 85Return points won %42.3#64 of 85
2.2129 total · best 8#11 of 85Acesper game
Head to head
45 matches since 20051
Hard · 3 matchesGroenefeld 2Razzano 1
Clay · 1 matchGroenefeld 1Razzano 0
Carpet · 1 matchGroenefeld 1Razzano 0
Grand Slams · 1 matchGroenefeld 1Razzano 0
Last meetings
10 Aug 2009 · Cincinnati · Round of 64 · HardGroenefeld won 6-3 3-6 6-4
12 Feb 2007 · Antwerp · Round of 32 · HardRazzano won 6-4 6-1
15 May 2006 · Rome · Round of 64 · ClayGroenefeld won 6-2 4-6 6-4
10 Oct 2005 · Moscow · Round of 32 · CarpetGroenefeld won 3-6 7-5 6-1
29 Aug 2005 · US Open · Round of 64 · HardGroenefeld won 3-6 6-3 6-4
Last 10 games
Titles, oldest to newest in 2006.
Groenefeld––––––––––
Razzano––––––––––
0.7
19 total · best 4
#55 of 85
10.9633 total · best 18#36 of 88Games wonper game10.6296 total · best 18#47 of 88
44.7#55 of 85Break points converted %42.1#74 of 85
52.9#39 of 88Sets won %40.9#73 of 88
50.9#38 of 88Games won %47.4#65 of 88
0.01 total · best 1#48 of 52Finalsper game–
1.272 total · best 2#32 of 88Sets wonper game1.027 total · best 2#69 of 88
1.164 total · best 2#48 of 88Sets lostper game · lower is better1.439 total · best 2#78 of 88
10.5610 total · best 19#48 of 88Games lostper game · lower is better11.8329 total · best 18#82 of 88
0.213 total · best 1#30 of 87Tiebreaksper game0.25 total · best 1#54 of 87
3.5203 total · best 12#83 of 85Double faultsper game · lower is better3.392 total · best 9#81 of 85