Chan v Fanning

Emily Fanning takes it, 8–1 on categories

Fanning wins on return points won %. Yau Venise Chan’s case rests on double faults, but it isn’t enough to swing it. WTA Tour career: Yau Venise Chan 17 matches, Fanning 7 matches.

• Fanning has the better return points won %: 71.8 to Yau Venise Chan’s 39.2.
• Fanning has 1 ace (one every 2 matches) to Yau Venise Chan’s no aces.
• Fanning averages a sets lost every 2.3 matches to Yau Venise Chan’s 0.7.
• Winners’ edge: Fanning’s team won 86%, Yau Venise Chan’s team won 76% of the matches they played.
• Longevity: Yau Venise Chan has 17 matches across 4 seasons, Fanning 7 in 2 — the averages matter more than the totals here.
• Small sample: Fanning (7 matches) — treat the averages with care.
• Not every stat was recorded for every match (aces, double faults, serve points…): those averages use only the games that logged them.

Built only from games in our stats database. A read of the numbers, not a tip.